In reply to
Stormlight
Stormlight
May 2, 2024
Stormlight
Stormlight
But you are free (not in the monetary sense) to modify and redistribute Waterhole, you just have to abide by what's stated in the licence.
So, in the case of redistribution, you're free to do that, p...
Then that is not the open source by definition.
https://opensource.org/osd
I understand what you want to say but that's "source-available" not "open source". Technically in literal sense open-source can mean that as well. But in the last 20-30 years, common meaning of open source is what I am claiming.
Basically, as Waterhole becomes more popular, more people will notice this. Heck some will even begin using it because they think it's "the open-source" not "an open-source"
Please check those two Wiki links few posts above which explain it well.
Here is the already discussed topic with the Waterhole dev.
https://www.reddit.com/r/laravel/comments/13q35as/waterhole_modern_laravelpowered_community_forum/jlcoq6j/
Yeah, I've seen that reddit thread before and I don't think what I've written above is incorrect. One of the commenters mentions this:
and then Toby commented:
So I guess it's not very clearly defined as to what open source could mean.