Thanks for the ideas! Some of the stuff I've written in the Philosophy is also highly relevant here:
The Waterhole business model is very simple: We make great software. You pay to use it. That money goes back into making the software even better. [...]
By charging for licenses, we avoid having to undertake other activities which would distract from product development, like soliciting donations, or running services. We believe that others are better placed to offer services around Waterhole, and we encourage freelancers, agencies, and entrepreneurs to seize this opportunity and become a part of the ecosystem.
That is to say, I'm not interested in doing anything involving services at this stage.
Dual licensing is too complicated. I think the only way I could see this working is with some kind of product limitation, like the Craft/Statamic model. Will keep thinking about it.
You don't have permission to do this.
You're going a bit too fast! Take a break and try again in a moment.
Something went wrong! Please reload the page and try again.
Thanks for the ideas! Some of the stuff I've written in the Philosophy is also highly relevant here:
That is to say, I'm not interested in doing anything involving services at this stage.
Dual licensing is too complicated. I think the only way I could see this working is with some kind of product limitation, like the Craft/Statamic model. Will keep thinking about it.